Login
 Username
 Password
 Remember me


 Log in Problems?
 New User? Sign Up!
APCJ Home
· Home
· Logout
· Edit User Info
Journal
· *Current Issue*
· Previous Issues
· Order Print Version
Author Information
· Submit Article
· Submission Criteria
· Copyright Policy
· APCJ Disclaimer
 PDF  MOCK JUROR DECISION-MAKING IN SEXUAL ABUSE CASES 

The empirical literature on variables affecting jury decision-making has focused primarily on cases with male perpetrators almost to the exclusion of female perpetrators. This is particularly true in studies involving sexual abuse cases. In order to further study the impact of gender on juror decision-making, mock jurors read sexual abuse case scenarios that manipulated perpetrator and victim gender, as well as victim age. Mock juror gender was also considered. Many of the results suggest less impact of gender than originally expected. However, mock juror gender did play a significant role in sentence recommendations, and short- and long-term effects of the abuse were correlated with sentence recommendations.

Suggested Citation:

Duke, Laura M. & Desforges, Donna M. (2007). Mock Juror Decision-Making in Sexual Abuse Cases
[Electronic Version]. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 3(2), 96-116.

Keywords: sexual abuse, abuse, mock juror, gender, decision-making


Homepage


Click title to view complete article.

To view a PDF Document you must have Adobe Acrobat or Acrobat Reader installed.

Download Adobe Reader
There is no charge for this download.


Sam Houston State University, College of Criminal Justice